From Tribal Dances to Data-Driven Decisions: Defining Organizations Through Mature Processes
I've found through recent discussions that an overemphasis on the "soft" side without a strong foundation in "hard" management principles can lead to what I call "tribal dances" – a lot of activity, perhaps well-intentioned, but ultimately lacking direction and measurable impact.
Gintautas Mežetis
2/1/20252 min read


In today's dynamic business landscape, organizations are constantly searching for ways to improve efficiency, enhance performance, and gain a competitive edge. We often hear about the importance of "soft" management skills, focusing on culture, values, and employee engagement. While these are undoubtedly crucial, I've found through recent discussions that an overemphasis on the "soft" side without a strong foundation in "hard" management principles can lead to what I call "tribal dances" – a lot of activity, perhaps well-intentioned, but ultimately lacking direction and measurable impact.
My core insight, which has been refined through engaging discussions, is this: Organizations can be defined by their processes and their maturity. It's not just about having processes, but about how well those processes are executed, measured, and continuously improved.
Think of it this way: a process, at its most basic, is a series of actions that transform inputs into outputs within a given timeframe. This is the fundamental building block of any organization. But simply defining the inputs, outputs, and timeframe isn't enough. We need to understand the journey of the work within that process.
Too often, departments are measured by internal, small subprocess KPIs. This can create a "silo mentality" where everyone is focused on their own little piece of the puzzle, without seeing the bigger picture. This "local optimization" can actually harm the overall organization. It's like optimizing the individual instruments in an orchestra without considering the harmony of the entire symphony.
What's the solution? It starts with defining the "box" – the specific area, department, or process you want to analyze. Then, define the inputs and outputs. Crucially, capture the status changes within the process. How does a task or case move from start to finish? This data is gold.
Using process mining techniques (or even simple flowcharts), visualize the actual flow of work. This often reveals surprising discrepancies between how things should work and how they actually work. Identify the bottlenecks, the areas of friction, the "tribal dances" where activity abounds but results lag.
From this analysis, you can refine and structure the process. Document it. This is essential for consistency and scalability. And finally, measure the impact of your improvements. Did the changes actually lead to better outcomes? This creates a feedback loop for continuous improvement.
This isn't just about numbers. It's about connecting the "hard" data with the "soft" aspects of organizational life. By understanding the flow of work and measuring its impact, we can create a more efficient, effective, and ultimately more human organization. It's about moving beyond gut feeling and "best effort" to data-driven decisions and demonstrable value. It's about transforming "tribal dances" into a well-orchestrated performance.
What are your thoughts? How do you balance "hard" and "soft" management in your organization? Share your experiences and insights in the comments below.
#processimprovement #management #datadriven #organizationalefficiency #leadership #continuousimprovement